Print this page

In atrial fibrillation, asymptomatic, older people, primary prevention of stroke, ischemic, embolic The Use of
systematic screening for atrial fibrillation at 75 years, using intermittent ECGs for 14 days, followed by oral anticoagulation if AF detected
As Diagnostic Tool
Is better Than
screening for atrial fibrillation only if symptoms
To slighty reduce, at 7 years, combined embolic events, severe bleeding or death: 5.5 events VS 5.7 per 100 person-years
Lancet. 2021 Aug 27:S0140-6736(21)01637-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01637-8 [Citation]
Clinical outcomes in systematic screening for atrial fibrillation (STROKESTOP): a multicentre, parallel group, unmasked, randomised controlled trial
Svennberg E, Friberg L, Frykman V, Al-Khalili F, Engdahl J, Rosenqvist M
Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: emma.svennberg@sll.se
Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Atrial fibrillation is a leading cause of ischaemic stroke. Early detection of atrial fibrillation can enable anticoagulant therapy to reduce ischaemic stroke and mortality. In this randomised study in an older population, we aimed to assess whether systematic screening for atrial fibrillation could reduce mortality and morbidity compared with no screening.

Methods: STROKESTOP was a multicentre, parallel group, unmasked, randomised controlled trial done in Halland and Stockholm in Sweden. All 75-76-year-olds residing in these two regions were randomly assigned (1:1) to be invited to screening for atrial fibrillation or to a control group. Participants attended local screening centres and those without a history of atrial fibrillation were asked to register intermittent electrocardiograms (ECGs) for 14 days. Treatment with oral anticoagulants was offered if atrial fibrillation was detected or untreated. All randomly assigned individuals were followed up in the intention-to-treat analysis for a minimum of 5 years for the primary combined endpoint of ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, systemic embolism, bleeding leading to hospitalisation, and all-cause death. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01593553.

Findings: From March 1, 2012, to May 28, 2014, 28 768 individuals were assessed for eligibility and randomly assigned to be invited to screening (n=14 387) or the control group (n=14 381). 408 individuals were excluded from the intervention group and 385 were excluded from the control group due to death or migration before invitation. There was no loss to follow-up. Of those invited to screening, 7165 (51·3%) of 13 979 participated. After a median follow-up of 6·9 years (IQR 6·5-7·2), significantly fewer primary endpoint events occurred in the intervention group (4456 [31·9%] of 13 979; 5·45 events per 100 years [95% CI 5·52-5·61]) than in the control group (4616 [33·0%] of 13 996; 5·68 events per 100 years [5·52-5·85]; hazard ratio 0·96 [95% CI 0·92-1·00]; p=0·045).

Interpretation: Screening for atrial fibrillation showed a small net benefit compared with standard of care, indicating that screening is safe and beneficial in older populations.

Funding: Stockholm County Council, the Swedish Heart & Lung Foundation, King Gustav V and Queen Victoria's Freemasons' Foundation, the Klebergska Foundation, the Tornspiran Foundation, the Scientific Council of Halland Region, the Southern Regional Healthcare Committee, the Swedish Stroke Fund, Carl Bennet AB, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Bristol Myers Squibb-Pfizer.

Pubmed record:  PMID: 34469764
Notes: 0
Theme: Atrial fibrillation : Clinical usefulness of systematic screening