In covid-19, SARS-CoV2, coronavirus, moderate to severe disease, hospitalized adults |
The Use of
remdesivir As Treatment, Acute |
Is better Than
placebo |
To achieve a small reduction in the proportion of patients receiving mechanical ventilation (RR, 0.71) and moderate improvements in time to recovery and patients suffering serious harm. No differences in mortality |
|
||
Major Update: Remdesivir for Adults With COVID-19 : A Living Systematic Review and Meta-analysis for the American College of Physicians Practice Points | ||
Kaka AS, MacDonald R, Greer N, Vela K, Duan-Porter W, Obley A, Wilt TJ | ||
Minneapolis VA Health Care System and University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota | ||
Systematic Review | ||
Background: Remdesivir is being studied and used for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Purpose: To update a previous review of remdesivir for adults with COVID-19, including new meta-analyses of patients with COVID-19 of any severity compared with control. Data sources: Several sources from 1 January 2020 through 7 December 2020. Study selection: English-language, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of remdesivir for COVID-19. New evidence is incorporated by using living review methods. Data extraction: 1 reviewer abstracted data; a second reviewer verified the data. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method were used. Data synthesis: The update includes 5 RCTs, incorporating data from a new large RCT and the final results of a previous RCT. Compared with control, a 10-day course of remdesivir probably results in little to no reduction in mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.93 [95% CI, 0.82 to 1.06]; 4 RCTs) but may result in a small reduction in the proportion of patients receiving mechanical ventilation (RR, 0.71 [CI, 0.56 to 0.90]; 3 RCTs). Remdesivir probably results in a moderate increase in the percentage of patients who recovered and a moderate decrease in serious adverse events and may result in a large reduction in time to recovery. Effect on hospital length of stay or percentage remaining hospitalized is mixed. Compared with a 10-day course for those not requiring ventilation at baseline, a 5-day course may reduce mortality, the need for ventilation, and serious adverse events while increasing the percentage of patients who recovered or clinically improved. Limitation: Summarizing findings was challenging because of varying disease severity definitions and outcomes. Conclusion: In hospitalized adults with COVID-19, remdesivir probably results in little to no mortality difference but probably improves the percentage recovered and reduces serious harms and may result in a small reduction in the proportion receiving ventilation. For patients not receiving ventilation, a 5-day course may provide greater benefits and fewer harms with lower drug costs than a 10-day course. Primary funding source: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. |
||
Pubmed record: PMID: 33560863 | ||
Notes: 0 | ||
Theme: Covid-19: possible specific active treatments |